PROTAC EZH2 degrader-1 overcomes the resistance of podophyllotoxin derivatives in refractory small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly detrimental occurrence associated with severe neurological disorders, lacking effective treatment currently. Proteolysis-targeting chimeric molecules (PROTACs) may provide new therapeutic avenues for treatment of podophyllotoxin derivatives-resistant SCLC with LM, warranting further exploration. METHODS: The SCLC cell line H128 expressing luciferase were mutated by MNNG to generate H128-Mut cell line. After subcutaneous inoculation of H128-Mut into nude mice, H128-LM and H128-BPM (brain parenchymal metastasis) cell lines were primarily cultured from LM and BPM tissues individually, and employed to in vitro drug testing. The SCLC-LM mouse model was established by inoculating H128-LM into nude mice via carotid artery and subjected to in vivo drug testing. RNA-seq and immunoblotting were conducted to uncover the molecular targets for LM. RESULTS: The SCLC-LM mouse model was successfully established, confirmed by in vivo live imaging and histological examination. The upregulated genes included EZH2, SLC44A4, VEGFA, etc. in both BPM and LM cells, while SLC44A4 was particularly upregulated in LM cells. When combined with PROTAC EZH2 degrader-1, the drug sensitivity of cisplatin, etoposide (VP16), and teniposide (VM26) for H128-LM was significantly increased in vitro. The in vivo drug trials with SCLC-LM mouse model demonstrated that PROTAC EZH2 degrader-1 plus VM26 or cisplatin/ VP16 inhibited H128-LM tumour significantly compared to VM26 or cisplatin/ VP16 alone (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The SCLC-LM model effectively simulates the pathophysiological process of SCLC metastasis to the leptomeninges. PROTAC EZH2 degrader-1 overcomes chemoresistance in SCLC, suggesting its potential therapeutic value for SCLC LM.

DEGRO guideline for personalized radiotherapy of brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to evaluate the existing evidence for radiotherapy for brain metastases in breast cancer patients and provide recommendations for the use of radiotherapy for brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the current review, a PubMed search was conducted including articles from 01/1985 to 05/2023. The search was performed using the following terms: (brain metastases OR leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) AND (breast cancer OR breast) AND (radiotherapy OR ablative radiotherapy OR radiosurgery OR stereotactic OR radiation). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Despite the fact that the biological subtype of breast cancer influences both the occurrence and relapse patterns of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), for most scenarios, no specific recommendations regarding radiotherapy can be made based on the existing evidence. For a limited number of BCBM (1-4), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is generally recommended irrespective of molecular subtype and concurrent/planned systemic therapy. In patients with 5-10 oligo-brain metastases, these techniques can also be conditionally recommended. For multiple, especially symptomatic BCBM, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), if possible with hippocampal sparing, is recommended. In cases of multiple asymptomatic BCBM (≥ 5), if SRS/SRT is not feasible or in disseminated brain metastases (> 10), postponing WBRT with early reassessment and reevaluation of local treatment options (8-12 weeks) may be discussed if a HER2/Neu-targeting systemic therapy with significant response rates in the central nervous system (CNS) is being used. In symptomatic leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, local radiotherapy (WBRT or local spinal irradiation) should be performed in addition to systemic therapy. In patients with disseminated leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in good clinical condition and with only limited or stable extra-CNS disease, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) may be considered. Data regarding the toxicity of combining systemic therapies with cranial and spinal radiotherapy are sparse. Therefore, no clear recommendations can be given, and each case should be discussed individually in an interdisciplinary setting.

Prognostic Role of Ventricular Size and Its Dynamics in Patients With Leptomeningeal Metastasis From Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hydrocephalus is a common radiologic sign in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from solid tumors which can be assessed using the Evans index (EI). Here, we explored the prognostic value of ventricular size in LM. METHODS: We identified patients with LM from solid tumors by chart review at 3 academic hospitals to explore the prognostic associations of the EI at diagnosis, first follow-up, and progression. RESULTS: We included 113 patients. The median age was 58.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46.1-65.8), 41 patients (36%) were male, and 72 patients (64%) were female. The most frequent cancers were lung cancer (n = 39), breast cancer (n = 36), and melanoma (n = 23). The median EI at baseline was 0.28 (IQR 0.26-0.31); the EI value was 0.27 or more in 67 patients (59%) and 0.30 or more in 37 patients (33%). Among patients with MRI follow-up, the EI increased by 0.01 or more in 16 of 31 patients (52%), including 8 of 30 patients (30%) without and 10 of 17 patients (59%) with LM progression at first follow-up. At LM progression, an increase of EI of 0.01 or more was noted in 18 of 34 patients (53%). The median survival was 2.9 months (IQR 1-7.2). Patients with a baseline EI below 0.27 had a longer survival than those with an EI of 0.27 or more (5.3 months, IQR 2.4-10.8, vs 1.3 months, IQR 0.6-4.1) (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.135-2.534, p = 0.0099). The median survival was 3.7 months (IQR 1.4-8.3) with an EI below 0.30 vs 1.8 months (IQR 0.8-4.1) with an EI of 0.30 or more (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.935-1.243, p = 0.1113). Among patients with follow-up scans available, the overall survival was 9.4 months (IQR 5.6-21.0) for patients with stable or decreased EI at first follow-up as opposed to 5.6 months (IQR 2.5-10.5) for those with an increase in the EI (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.937-1.243; p = 0.300). DISCUSSION: The EI at baseline is prognostic in LM. An increase of EI during follow-up may be associated with inferior LM progression-free survival. Independent validation cohorts with larger sample size and evaluation of confounding factors will help to better define the clinical utility of EI assessments in LM.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and brain metastases in gastroesophageal carcinoma: a real-world analysis of clinical and pathologic characteristics and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastasis (BrM) and Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis (LMC) are uncommon complications in gastroesophageal carcinoma (GEC) patients. These patients have a poor prognosis and are challenging to treat. We described the clinicopathologic features and outcomes in the largest cohort of Central Nervous System (CNS) metastasis in GEC patients. METHODS: single-center retrospective study of GEC treated from 2007 to 2021. Clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment modalities were reviewed. Survival was calculated from the date of CNS diagnosis until date of death/last follow-up using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used. RESULTS: Of 3283 GEC patients, 100 (3.04%) were diagnosed with BrM and 20 with LMC (0.61%). Patients with known human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status (N = 48), 60% were HER2 positive (defined as IHC 3 + or IHC 2+/FISH+). Among LMC patients most were signet-ring subtype (85%), and only 15% (2/13) were HER2 positive. Median survival was 0.7; 3.8; and 7.7 months in BrM patients treated with best supportive care, radiation, and surgery, respectively (p < 0.001). In LMC, median survival was 0.7 month in patients who had best supportive care (7/19) and 2.8 months for those who had whole brain radiation therapy (p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis showed worse outcomes in ECOG ≥ 2 (p = 0.002), number of BrM ≥ 4 (p < 0.001) and number of metastatic sites (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: HER2 expression were enriched in patients with BrM, while it is uncommon in LMC. Patients treated with surgery followed by radiation had an improved OS in BrM and WBRT benefited patients with LMC.

The efficacy of slow-rate ventriculolumbar perfusion chemotherapy for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the symptomatic response and side effects of ventriculolumbar perfusion (VLP) methotrexate chemotherapy with a low perfusion rate in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis. METHODS: Patients in a single-arm, two-stage phase II trial based on Simon's minimax design received VLP with a reduced (15 cc/h) perfusion rate with the purpose of decreasing constitutional side effects such as nausea/vomiting, insomnia, and confusion. The primary outcome was control of increased intracranial pressure (ICP). The secondary outcome was an occurrence of side effects. The results were compared with those of a previous trial of VLP with a 20-cc/h perfusion rate. RESULTS: Total 90 patients were enrolled. Out of 65 patients with increased ICP, 32 achieved normalized ICP after VLP chemotherapy (bias-adjusted response rate = 51%). The incidence of moderate-to-severe nausea/vomiting was reduced to 46% from 64% in the previous study, and that of sleep disturbance was increased to 13% from 9%, but both failed to reach statistical significance. The incidence of moderate-to-severe confusion was significantly reduced to 12% from 23% in the previous study (p = 0.04). Median overall survival was better among patients with controlled ICP than among those who remained with increased ICP (193 days vs. 94 days, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Compared with a higher perfusion rate, the low perfusion rate failed to provide non-inferior ICP control or improved side effects, except for confusion. The relationship between VLP perfusion rate and ICP control needs to be evaluated in future trials adjusting for bias from uncompleted protocol due to poor general condition.

Effectiveness of high-dose third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treating EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is associated with an extremely poor prognosis in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), currently the preferred drug of choice, have significantly improved treatment outcomes in these patients. However, the optimal dose of third-generation EGFR-TKIs for clinical use remains undetermined in NSCLC patients with LM. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of 105 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and cytologically confirmed LM who had received third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment after LM diagnosis. Patients were stratified into high- and standard-dose groups based on the treatment dose of third-generation EGFR-TKI. Subsequent treatments for LM were collected, particularly the efficacy of different doses of third-generation EGFR-targeted drugs. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 28.7 months (range 0.6-40.2) at the cut-off date of August 27, 2023. The 105 included patients who received third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment had a clinical response rate (CRR) of 54.3 % (57/105), and the median overall survival (OS) from LM diagnosis was 12.3 months (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 10.0-15.0). Among them, 46 (43.8 %) patients received a high-dose regimen, and the remaining 59 (56.2 %) patients were treated with standard-dose drugs. Patients treated with high-dose third-generation EGFR-TKIs showed a higher CRR and longer OS than those treated with standard-dose therapy (65.2 % vs. 45.8 %, p = 0.047; 15.0 vs. 10.2 months, p = 0.014). Importantly, high-dose third-generation EGFR-TKI showed superior OS than standard-dose treatment in all subgroups (prior first-/second-generation EGFR-TKI resistance group, 19.5 vs. 9.8 months, p = 0.047; third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance group, 10.0 vs. 4.3 months, p = 0.045; EGFR-TKI naive group, not reach vs. 15.6 months, p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis revealed that high-dose third-generation EGFR-TKIs, intrathecal chemotherapy, previous TKI treatment history, and Karnofsky Performance Status score were independent predictors of OS (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose third-generation EGFR-TKIs are effective treatments for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations and LM, regardless of previous EGFR-TKI exposure.

Discrimination of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and meningeal inflammation/infection with internal acoustic canal enhancement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the presence and pattern of enhancement at the internal acoustic canal (IAC) could help in discriminating between leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LCa) and meningeal inflammation/infection (MMI). METHODS: Magnetic resonance (MR) images of patients with leptomeningeal enhancement were retrospectively evaluated. MR images of the LCa group (n = 33), MMI group (n = 19) and control group (n = 33) were evaluated for the presence, type (moderate/prominent), and localization (unilateral/bilateral) of the IAC enhancement. RESULTS: The presence of IAC enhancement was significantly more common in patients with LCa (p < 0.001). In 73.7 % of patients with MMI, no contrast enhancement was observed in the IAC. In patients with contrast enhancement in the IAC, the risk of LCa in the etiology is 20 times greater than the risk of having MMI. Seventy-five percent of the IAC enhancement seen in LCa patients and 20 % of the IAC enhancements seen in MMI patients was bilateral. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Intense contrast enhancement of the IAC can be a marker for LCa.

[A Case of Meningeal Carcinomatosis following Esophagogastric Junction Cancer Surgery].

In a 79-year-old man, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and CT revealed an entire circumferential type 3 tumor with stenosis from the lower thoracic esophagus to the abdominal esophagus. He was diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma and underwent middle and lower esophageal resection and 2 regional lymph node dissections. The postoperative pathological diagnosis was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, pT3N0M0, pStage ⅡA esophagogastric junction cancer(Siewert type Ⅱ). The patient was followed-up without postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, following the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021(6th edition). Six months postoperatively, contrast-enhanced CT revealed multiple lymph node, small intestinal mesenteric, and left adrenal metastases, and SOX therapy was initiated. After 4 courses of SOX therapy, the patient was brought to the emergency room and admitted with anorexia and weakness, and consciousness disorder was observed on the next day. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the head was indicative of meningeal carcinomatosis, and cytological examination of the spinal fluid revealed adenocarcinoma, which was diagnosed as meningeal carcinomatosis from esophagogastric junction carcinoma. Subsequently, his consciousness disorder worsened, and he died on the 9th day of hospitalization. We report a rare case of meningeal carcinomatosis following esophagogastric junction cancer.

Pharmacotherapy for leptomeningeal disease in breast cancer.

Clinical data supporting the best therapeutic approach in leptomeningeal disease (LMD; also known as leptomeningeal metastases or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) are lacking. Despite the development of new agents and increasing incidence of central nervous system metastases, patients with LMD are often excluded from clinical trials in breast cancer, with very few conducted specifically in LMD. Consequently, current evidence may not provide an accurate reflection of real-world clinical practice. This review aims to provide further insight into the treatment strategies for patients with breast cancer and LMD. We explore differences between clinical and real-world studies, considering inclusion criteria, levels of evidence for LMD diagnosis, and time between diagnosis of LMD and LMD-specific treatment initiation. Patient prognosis is poor; median overall survival is limited to several months, with approximately 10% of patients alive at 12 months. Efficacy results have been reported for various systemic and intrathecal agents in LMD to date. Systemic therapies under investigation for LMD in breast cancer include tucatinib, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and paclitaxel trevatide; trastuzumab is the main intrathecal agent currently under investigation. Recent trials investigating systemic or intrathecal therapies are typically small, single-arm studies, and most are restricted to patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. Moreover, the variability among inclusion criteria and response assessment tools makes the interpretation of results difficult. Large retrospective cohorts with various inclusion criteria and treatment regimens provide some real-world data. However, there remains an urgent need for randomised clinical trials which include patients with LMD across all breast cancer subtypes.

An overview of the therapeutic strategies for neoplastic meningitis due to breast cancer: when and why?

INTRODUCTION: Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, is characterized by the infiltration of tumor cells into the meninges, and poses a significant therapeutic challenge owing to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Breast cancer is a common cause of NM among solid tumors, further highlighting the urgent need to explore effective therapeutic strategies. This review aims to provide insights into the evolving landscape of NM therapy in breast cancer by collating existing research, evaluating current treatments, and identifying potential emerging therapeutic options. AREAS COVERED: This review explores the clinical features, therapeutic strategies, recent advances, and challenges of managing NM in patients with breast cancer. Its management includes multimodal strategies, including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and supportive care. This review also emphasizes targeted drug options and optimal drug concentrations, and discusses emerging therapies. Additionally, it highlights the variability in treatment outcomes and the potential of combination regimens to effectively manage NM in breast cancer. EXPERT OPINION: Challenges in treating NM include debates over clinical trial end points and the management of adverse effects. Drug resistance and low response rates are significant hurdles, particularly inHER2-negative breast cancer. The development of more precise and cost-effective medications with improved selectivity is crucial. Additionally, global efforts are needed for infrastructure development and cancer control considering the diverse nature of the disease.

The value of 3D high-resolution IR-prepared fast spoiled gradient-recalled MRI in the diagnosis of meningeal carcinomatosis involving the cranial nerves.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of three-dimension (3D) high-resolution inversion recovery (IR)-prepared fast spoiled gradient-recalled (SPGR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of cranial nerve meningeal carcinomatosis (MC). METHODS: A total of 114 patients with MC from January 2015 to March 2020 were enrolled and their MRIs were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent MRIs before being administered a contrast agent. Both a 2D conventional MRI sequence and a 3D IR-prepared fast SPGR high-resolution T1-weighted (BRAVO) scan sequence were measured after contrast agent administration. The characteristics of MC and the involved cranial nerves were then examined. RESULTS: Among the 114 MC patients, 81 (71.05%) had cranial nerve enhancement on contrast-enhanced 3D-BRAVO imaging, while only 41 (35.96%) had image enhancement on conventional MRI. The contrast-enhanced 3D-BRAVO displayed stronger image contrast enhancement of the cranial nerves than the conventional MRI (P < 0.001). Furthermore, detection rates for the facial and auditory nerves, trigeminal nerve, oculomotor nerve, sublingual nerve, optic nerve, glossopharyngeal/vagal/accessory nerve, and abductor nerve on contrast-enhanced 3D-BRAVO imaging were 58.77%, 47.37%, 9.65%, 8.77%, 5.26%, 3.51%, and 0.88%, respectively. We found a statistically significant difference between the affected facial and auditory nerves, as well as the trigeminal nerve, oculomotor nerve, sublingual nerve, and optic nerve. CONCLUSION: In MC, contrast-enhanced 3D-BRAVO imaging displayed the cranial nerves more effectively than 2D conventional enhanced MRI. The facial, auditory, and trigeminal nerves are the primary nerves involved in MC, and improved scanning of these nerves would aid in the early detection and treatment of MC.

Cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumor DNA contributes to the detection and characterization of leptomeningeal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has revealed the unique genetic characteristics of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the research in this area is still very limited. METHODS: Patients with LM from NSCLC (n = 80) were retrospectively analyzed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in CSF was tested by next-generation sequencing (NGS), with paired extracranial tissue or plasma samples included for comparison. An independent non-LM cohort (n = 100) was also analyzed for comparative purposes. Clinical outcomes were compared with Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards methodologies. RESULTS: An overwhelming 93.8% of patients carried druggable mutations in NSCLC LM, with EGFR (78.8%) being the most prevalent. Notably, 4 patients who tested negative for driver genes in extracranial samples surprisingly showed EGFR mutations in their CSF and subsequently benefited from targeted therapy. There was a clear difference in genetic profiles between CSF and extracranial samples, with CSF showing more driver gene detections, increased Copy Number Variations (CNVs), and varied resistance mechanisms among individuals. Abnormalities in cell-cycle regulatory molecules were highly enriched in LM (50.9% vs 31.0%, p = 0.017), and CDKN2A/2B deletions were identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for LM patients, with a significant reduction in median OS (p = 0.013), supported by multivariate analysis (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.32-5.26, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: CSF-based ctDNA analysis is crucial for detecting and characterizing genetic alterations in NSCLC LM. The distinct genetic profiles in CSF and extracranial tissues emphasize the need for personalized treatment approaches.

Role of intrathecal chemotherapy in the management of meningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether intrathecal chemotherapy improves clinical outcomes in patients with meningeal carcinomatosis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with breast cancer diagnosed with meningeal carcinomatosis. Clinical and treatment data were collected from the patients' medical charts. The primary outcome was overall survival, and the secondary outcomes were time to neurological deterioration and reporting of clinical benefit. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounders were used to evaluate the clinical response and overall survival, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 109 female patients were included, 50 (45.9%) of whom received intrathecal chemotherapy with methotrexate and dexamethasone. The median treatment duration was 3 weeks (range, 1-13 weeks). Patients treated with intrathecal chemotherapy were more likely to report clinical benefit (74% versus 57.7%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 9.0, 95%CI=2.6-30.9, p<0.001). However, there was no difference in the time to neurologic deterioration (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96, 95%CI= 0.57-1.59, p=0.86). Patients who received intrathecal chemotherapy did not show an increase in overall survival compared with that of patients who did not receive intrathecal chemotherapy (median overall survival = 1.8 months, 95%CI= 1.27-3.0 versus 2.5, 95%CI= 1.9-3.9, adjusted HR = 0.71, 95%CI= 0.41-1.22, p=0.21). There was a significant interaction between intrathecal chemotherapy and systemic treatment, and patients who received systemic therapy without intrathecal chemotherapy had better overall survival than that of the no-treatment group (adjusted HR = 0.38, 95%CI= 0.20-0.70, p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Intrathecal chemotherapy did not increase overall survival or time to neurological deterioration and should not preclude or postpone systemic treatments.

Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis from Solid Tumor Malignancies: Treatment Strategies and Biomarkers.

Leptomeningeal metastases/diseases (LMDs) are a late-stage complication of solid tumor or hematologic malignancies. LMD is spread of cancer cells to the layers of the leptomeninges (pia and arachnoid maters) and subarachnoid space seen in 3 to 5% of cancer patients. It is a disseminated disease which carries with it significant neurologic morbidity and mortality. Our understanding of disease pathophysiology is currently lacking; however, advances are being made. As our knowledge of disease pathogenesis has improved, treatment strategies have evolved. Mainstays of treatment such as radiotherapy have changed from involved-field radiotherapy strategies to proton craniospinal irradiation which has demonstrated promising results in recent clinical trials. Systemic treatment strategies have also improved from more traditional chemotherapeutics with limited central nervous system (CNS) penetration to more targeted therapies with better CNS tumor response. Many challenges remain from earlier clinical detection of disease through improvement of active treatment options, but we are getting closer to meaningful treatment.

Effects of intrathecal pemetrexed on the survival of patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.

PURPOSE: To explore the impact of intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) on the survival of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAC) patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). METHODS: We analyzed patients with LUAC and LM who received systemic therapy after LM diagnosis at the Fujian Cancer Hospital between July 2018 and March 2022. Patients who underwent IP were assigned to the IP group; those without IP treatment were designated as the non-IP group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the two groups. RESULTS: 165 patients were enrolled: 83 and 82 in the IP and non-IP groups, respectively. After 1:1 PSM, we included 114 patients in the matched cohort. Median overall survival (OS) was 13.2 months (95% CI 10.8-15.6 months) in the IP group versus 10.1 months (95% CI 5.3-14.9 months) in the non-IP group (P = 0.488). Only Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) was confirmed as an independent predictor for OS in the matched cohort (hazard ratio (HR) 2.03; P = 0.023). Multivariate competing-risks analysis showed that IP significantly correlated with central nervous system-related death (HR 0.31; P = 0.046). When stratified by ECOG PS, IP improved survival in patients with poor ECOG PS (PS = 2) (14.3 months vs. 1.6 months; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal pemetrexed did not enhance OS for the entire LUAC patient with LM compared to non-intrathecal chemotherapy. However, it exhibited the potential to reduce the risk of central nervous system-related mortality and improve survival in patients with poor ECOG PS.

Liquid biopsy in the setting of leptomeningeal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The blood-brain barrier can prevent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) derived from the central nervous system from entering the blood making it challenging to evaluate molecular features of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). Accordingly, we sought to systematically compare the diagnostic power or significance of ctDNA derived from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compared to plasma ctDNA in patients with LM. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed under the PRISMA guideline. We used PubMed, EMBASE, and the EuroPMC to search the literature using combinations of the following terms: circulating tumor DNA, ctDNA, circulating tumor cell, brain metastasis, leptomeningeal metastasis, outcome(s), and prognosis. We included all available English language studies that compared the diagnostic significance of CSF derived and serum ctDNA. All eligible studies level of bias was assessed using the New Castle Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: Our meta-analysis from 6 included studies (n = 226) that confirmed the diagnostic power of liquid biopsies in detecting genomic alteration is better when taking a CSF-derived samples than from the plasma (RR 1.46 [0.93; 2.29]; I2 = 92%; p-value < 0.01). CONCLUSION: CSF ctDNA is better at describing molecular landscape for LM; such an understanding may ultimately help inform patient treatment and responses to therapy.

Genomic profiling and pre-clinical modelling of breast cancer leptomeningeal metastasis reveals acquisition of a lobular-like phenotype.

Breast cancer leptomeningeal metastasis (BCLM), where tumour cells grow along the lining of the brain and spinal cord, is a devastating development for patients. Investigating this metastatic site is hampered by difficulty in accessing tumour material. Here, we utilise cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and CSF disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) to explore the clonal evolution of BCLM and heterogeneity between leptomeningeal and extracranial metastatic sites. Somatic alterations with potential therapeutic actionability were detected in 81% (17/21) of BCLM cases, with 19% detectable in CSF cfDNA only. BCLM was enriched in genomic aberrations in adherens junction and cytoskeletal genes, revealing a lobular-like breast cancer phenotype. CSF DTCs were cultured in 3D to establish BCLM patient-derived organoids, and used for the successful generation of BCLM in vivo models. These data reveal that BCLM possess a unique genomic aberration profile and highlight potential cellular dependencies in this hard-to-treat form of metastatic disease.

Increasing discrepancy of MR imaging and CSF study in patients with leptomeningeal seeding from lung adenocarcinoma after targeted therapy using a tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology for the evaluation of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) on MRI after targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of nonsmall cell lung cancer patients registered with NCT03257124 from May 2017 to December 2018, with progressive disease despite targeted therapy. Twenty-nine patients whose MRI scans exhibited LM at the time of registration were enrolled. During the targeted therapy with osimertinib, MRI scans, and subsequent CSF examinations were performed in every 2 months. In total, 113 MRI scans and CSF cytology data after treatment were collected. For each CE MRI scan, LM positivity was evaluated on 3D T1-weighted image (T1WI) and 2D FLAIR. The correlation between MRI and CSF cytology results and the diagnostic performance of MRI with CSF cytology as a reference standard were evaluated. RESULTS: After treatment, MRI revealed positivity for LM in 81 and negativity in 32. CSF results were positive in 69 examinations and negative in 44. The diagnostic accuracy of CE 3D T1WI and 2D FLAIR was 0.52 and 0.46, respectively. After targeted therapy, discrepancy in the CSF and MRI results tended to increase over time. The proportions of concordant MRI and CSF cytology results after targeted therapy were 66%, 58%, 62%, and 47% at the first, second, third, and fourth follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION: The discrepancy of MRI in evaluation of LM and CSF cytology increases over time after targeted therapy with osimertinib. LM positivity on MRI could be a surrogate imaging marker in the pre- and immediate posttargeted-treatment with Osimertinib but not after sessions of osimertinib.

Cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumour DNA genotyping and survival analysis in lung adenocarcinoma with leptomeningeal metastases.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) remains poor. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has been proven to be abundantly present in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); hence, its clinical implication as a biomarker needs to be further verified. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 35 lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients with LM, and matched CSF and plasma samples were collected from all patients. All paired samples underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 139 lung cancer-associated genes. The clinical characteristics and genetic profiling of LM were analysed in association with survival prognosis. RESULTS: LM showed genetic heterogeneity, in which CSF had a higher detection rate of ctDNA (P = 0.003), a higher median mutation count (P < 0.0001), a higher frequency of driver mutations (P < 0.01), and more copy number variation (CNV) alterations (P < 0.001) than plasma. The mutation frequencies of the EGFR, TP53, CDKN2A, MYC and CDKN2B genes were easier to detect in CSF than in LUAD tissue (P < 0.05), possibly reflecting the underlying mechanism of LM metastasis. CSF ctDNA is helpful for analysing the mechanism of EGFR-TKI resistance. In cohort 1, which comprised patients who received 1/2 EGFR-TKIs before the diagnosis of LM, TP53 and CDKN2A were the most common EGFR-independent resistant mutations. In cohort 2, comprising those who progressed after osimertinib and developed LM, 7 patients (43.75%) had EGFR CNV detected in CSF but not plasma. Furthermore, patient characteristics and various genes were included for interactive survival analysis. Patients with EGFR-mutated LUAD (P = 0.042) had a higher median OS, and CSF ctDNA mutation with TERT (P = 0.013) indicated a lower median OS. Last, we reported an LM case in which CSF ctDNA dynamic changes were well correlated with clinical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: CSF ctDNA could provide a more comprehensive genetic landscape of LM, indicating the potential metastasis-related and EGFR-TKI resistance mechanisms of LM patients. In addition, genotyping of CSF combined with clinical outcomes can predict the prognosis of LUAD patients with LM.

Novel approaches to treatment of leptomeningeal metastases.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The incidence of leptomeningeal metastases is increasing in the setting of improved survival from systemic cancers. In more recent years, our understanding of leptomeningeal metastasis pathogenesis, how to diagnose and treat has been evolving. RECENT FINDINGS: Diagnosing leptomeningeal metastasis has been challenging due to the limitations of cytology and neuroimaging; However, newer techniques detecting circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have shown potential advantage with diagnosis, quantification and detection of oncogenic mutations. The use of small molecule inhibitors and immunotherapy has shown some promise in specific leptomeningeal metastasis subtypes. SUMMARY: These new discoveries have improved clinical trials' ability to assess treatment response and thereby more optimally compare different treatments. Furthermore, they have helped the individual clinician better diagnose, monitor the disease and provide novel therapies.